In a recent interview, US President Donald Trump discusses potential successors and addresses his views on the Constitution and military options regarding Greenland.
In an interview with NBC, US President
Donald Trump expressed uncertainty about his obligation to adhere to the US Constitution, raising questions about his commitment to constitutional norms.
When asked directly if he believes he must follow the Constitution, Trump remarked, "I don’t know," which diverges from established interpretations of the 22nd Amendment that prohibits any individual from being elected more than twice as president.
Despite previous discussions regarding a potential third term, Trump appeared to downplay such ambitions during the interview.
He acknowledged that many supporters desire his candidacy but reiterated, "As far as I know, that is not allowed," and clarified that he does not intend to pursue a third term, focusing instead on fulfilling a first term.
Trump indicated that he aims to pass the presidency to an adept successor, mentioning that it is premature to determine specific candidates.
However, he praised current Vice President J.D. Vance as a strong candidate, describing him as a "fantastic, brilliant guy." He also highlighted Secretary of State Marco Rubio as another capable figure in the Republican Party.
Trump emphasized that there is an abundance of talent within the party for future leadership.
The conversation then shifted to international matters, particularly regarding Trump's long-standing interest in Greenland.
He did not dismiss the potential for military action to acquire the island, stating, "I am not saying I will do it, but I don’t rule anything out." He articulated a belief that Greenland is crucial for US national security, downplaying the size of its population and emphasizing the strategic significance of the territory.
In contrast, Trump's remarks on Canada indicated he does not envision military intervention as a means of incorporating the country as a new state.
He stated, "I don’t think we will ever come to that point" in reference to Canada.
However, he remained open regarding Greenland, suggesting that "something could happen" with respect to its status.